|
|
Post by chuckiemaggio on Oct 26, 2016 14:57:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinnum on Oct 26, 2016 16:38:00 GMT -5
I find it to be really surprising that some schools' news papers were omitted, yet Duquesne participated, and was still voted so low.
|
|
|
|
Post by chuckiemaggio on Oct 26, 2016 16:44:56 GMT -5
I find it to be really surprising that some schools' news papers were omitted, yet Duquesne participated, and was still voted so low. Just a quick background to that: No paper was omitted, the others just never submitted a poll. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinnum on Oct 26, 2016 17:06:52 GMT -5
I find it to be really surprising that some schools' news papers were omitted, yet Duquesne participated, and was still voted so low. Just a quick background to that: No paper was omitted, the others just never submitted a poll. I meant there input was not factored in. I assume that everyone is prone to overweighing their own program and Duquesne had a good year last year and seems to be on the upswing. I was surprised to see them so low. |
|
|
|
Post by fjs64 on Oct 26, 2016 17:15:04 GMT -5
I am not an expert on the dukes, but they lost their outstanding backcourt to graduation and LG Gill, a nemesis to us, to transfer (graduate transfet) I believe to Pitt. I would assume the expectations are low.
|
|
|
|
Post by fortytwo on Oct 26, 2016 17:41:08 GMT -5
Didn't Gill transfer to Maryland?
|
|
|
|
Post by njbonnie08 on Oct 26, 2016 18:18:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinnum on Oct 26, 2016 18:20:32 GMT -5
I was thinking they were going to be pretty good again, with the addition of the Niagara transfer.
But admittedly, I don't really follow them and could be mistaken.
|
|
