Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2009 8:08:12 GMT -5
That's a good question! Given the roster, and assuming Kelvin gets a 'ship like Jake did, that would leave 1 available for 2010-11. I would think the most pressing need is for a point guard since both points would be seniors. But rosters are fluid, people come and go...maybe a 'ship or two would open by then? |
|
|
|
Post by Copenhagen on Sept 1, 2009 8:15:11 GMT -5
Have to believe that 1 or maybe even 2 will fall through the cracks .... hard to keep everyone happy especially given the amount of underclassman we have and how many are best suited to play the Wing whether its SF or SG.
|
|
|
|
Post by onemorebucket on Sept 1, 2009 14:07:07 GMT -5
They may not be father and son, but we would be remiss if we didn't mention the most famous Bonnie basketball family connection of all (no offense to the Stith borthers), Bob Lanier and his nephew Rob.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chuck on Sept 1, 2009 16:03:21 GMT -5
That's a good question! Given the roster, and assuming Kelvin gets a 'ship like Jake did, that would leave 1 available for 2010-11. I would think the most pressing need is for a point guard since both points would be seniors. But rosters are fluid, people come and go...maybe a 'ship or two would open by then? Sheehey is described as having a great shot. This does not describe a player on the team. By far the Bonnies were worst 3 point shooting team in the A-10 and one of the worst in the nation (283 in the nation). Bonnies need a Tyler Relph, who could consistently knock down the 3. Fluid roster? Does not compare to Solomon, but last year Matt Morgan and Hillary Haley. This year Greese and Blackburn. Somewhat expecting at least another scholarship becoming available. statsheet.com/mcb/teams/stats/3pt?season=2008-2009 |
|
|
|
Post by jmp on Sept 1, 2009 17:48:58 GMT -5
Sheehey is not a possibility..we are not one of the schools in the mix. Hamrucker's post on
the Bevel is indeed correct the Bradley game is off. Still looking for one final home game.
Rumblings of possibly UB but Coach Witherspoon wont agree, it would seem to be a perfect
home and home scenario.
|
|
|
|
Post by sneakers on Sept 2, 2009 9:01:16 GMT -5
Sheehey is not a possibility..we are not one of the schools in the mix. I have to say I am not surprised. Can there be two schools that are more different than Stanford and Bonas? It made no sense that he would like to go to Stanford and his next choice would be Bonas. Geography, academics, climate, size of school, competitiveness of league, etc. are all very different between the two schools. If he doesn't get offered at Stanford chances are he will get offered by a college that is more similar to Stanford than Bonas is. There are a lot of other exciting players in the mix though. If we hit on any of them we'll continue to improve. |
|
ka
Junior Member
Posts: 317
|
Post by ka on Sept 2, 2009 10:25:21 GMT -5
Stanford sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by sbu79 on Sept 2, 2009 12:43:05 GMT -5
ya - they turned me down too. |
|
|
|
Post by gobonas1 on Sept 2, 2009 19:07:36 GMT -5
Brian and Sean Byrnes - intramural hoops mid 90's
|
|
