|
|
Post by FriendsofAN44 on Apr 25, 2006 15:31:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bonafide on Apr 25, 2006 20:13:30 GMT -5
Telling it like it is. Good story.
|
|
|
|
Post by captainron on Apr 27, 2006 14:34:39 GMT -5
I don't buy the fact that it was Lane's decision to hire Van Turnand Koff. Everybody knew that Wickerbasket called the shots when it came to the program. Wickerbasket's a douchebag. I was right all along and nobody believed me.
|
|
|
|
Post by FriendsofAN44 on Apr 27, 2006 16:19:10 GMT -5
Rumor around the breakfast circuit is he got 3 years salary - about $300,000.
|
|
|
|
Post by sbu79 on Apr 27, 2006 16:52:43 GMT -5
I'd say that's pretty good for a guy whose contract was up anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoachSBU on Apr 27, 2006 18:18:01 GMT -5
I'm just glad we're rid of all these self-servient imbeciles, including Gothard. If he was doing the job he was hired to do, for this university, then less pain would have been endured. Hopefully, we've learned our lesson and we'll be a little more careful in the future and be a better judge of character when it comes to employment in such high positions.
|
|
Swede
Sophomore Member
Posts: 179
|
Post by Swede on Apr 28, 2006 6:57:17 GMT -5
Careful, CoachSBU. Our sue-happy former employees might come after you for defamation of character now!!
|
|
|
|
Post by DemBonnies on Apr 28, 2006 7:01:48 GMT -5
Careful, CoachSBU. Our sue-happy former employees might come after you for defamation of character now!! Swede: Wouldn't they have to have character to be defamed or is just being a character justification enough? |
|
|
|
Post by bonnievet on Apr 28, 2006 21:16:22 GMT -5
I put a lot of the blame on the trustees for not taking action after Gothard asked for their help with controlling Wickenheiser. If the trustees wouldn't stop Wick than who could.
|
|
